| EXTINCTION OF PERMIAN MARINE ANIMALS LIKE SHARKS,TRILOBITES AND AMMONITES |
Permian–Triassic
extinction event:
The
Permian–Triassic extinction event, colloquially known as the Great Dying,was an
extinction event that occurred around the boundary between the Permian and
Triassic geologic periods, and with them the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras. It is
Earth's most severe known extinction event, with the extinction of 57% of
biological families, 62% of genera, 81% of marine species, and 70% of
terrestrial vertebrate species. It is also the greatest known mass extinction
of insects. It is the greatest of the "Big Five" mass extinctions of
the Phanerozoic. There is evidence for one to three distinct pulses, or phases,
of extinction, with the major pulse of marine extinction occurring in a 60,000-100,000
year interval around 251.902 million years ago (mya) marking the boundary
between the Permian and Triassic periods. There is some controversy regarding
the chronology of the extinctions on land and whether they are synchronous with
the main marine extinction event.
The
scientific consensus is that the main cause of the extinction was the flood
basalt eruptions that created the Siberian Traps, which released sulfur dioxide
and carbon dioxide, resulting in euxinia (oxygen-starved, sulfurous
oceans),[elevated global temperatures and acidified oceans. The level of
atmospheric carbon dioxide rose from around 400 ppm to 2,500 ppm with
approximately 3,900 to 12,000 gigatonnes of carbon being added to the
ocean-atmosphere system during this period.
Several
other contributing factors have been proposed, including the emission of carbon
dioxide from the burning of oil and coal deposits ignited by the eruptions;
emissions of methane from the gasification of methane clathrates ;emissions of
methane by novel methanogenic microorganisms nourished by minerals dispersed in
the eruptions; longer and more intense El Niño events; and an extraterrestrial
impact that created the Araguainha crater and caused seismic release of methane
and the destruction of the ozone layer with increased exposure to solar
radiation
Dating:
Previously,
it was thought that rock sequences spanning the Permian–Triassic boundary were
too few and too incomplete for scientists to reliably determine their details. However,
it is now possible to date the extinction with millennial precision. U–Pb
zircon dates from five volcanic ash beds from the Global Stratotype Section and
Point for the Permian–Triassic boundary at Meishan, China, establish a
high-resolution age model for the extinction – allowing exploration of the
links between global environmental perturbation, carbon cycle disruption, mass
extinction, and recovery at millennial timescales. The first appearance of the
conodont Hindeodus parvus has been used to delineate the Permian-Triassic
boundary.
The
extinction occurred between 251.941 ± 0.037 and 251.880 ± 0.031 million years
ago, a duration of 60 ± 48 thousand years. A large, abrupt global decrease in
δ13C, the ratio of the stable isotope carbon-13 to that of carbon-12, coincides
with this extinction, and is sometimes used to identify the Permian–Triassic
boundary and the Permian-Triassic Mass Extinction event (PTME) in rocks that
are unsuitable for radiometric dating. The negative carbon isotope excursion's
magnitude was 4–7% and lasted for approximately 500 kyr,though estimating its
exact value is challenging due to diagenetic alteration of many sedimentary
facies spanning the boundary.
Marine
organisms Extinction :
Marine
invertebrates suffered the greatest losses during the P–Tr extinction, although
previous estimates of 90–96% marine species extinction were due to historical
conflation with the end-Capitanian mass extinction, which occurred 7–10 million
years earlier. Evidence of these losses was found in samples from south China
sections at the P–Tr boundary. Here, 286 out of 329 marine invertebrate genera
disappear within the final two sedimentary zones containing conodonts from the
Permian. The decrease in diversity was probably caused by a sharp increase in
extinctions, rather than a decrease in speciation.
INVERTIBRATE ARTHROPODS MARINE TRILOBITES BECAME MORE OR LESS EXTINCT DURING THIS PERIOD
| INVERTIBRATE ARTHROPODS MARINE TRILOBITES BECAME MORE OR LESS EXTINCT DURING THIS PERIOD |
The
extinction primarily affected organisms with calcium carbonate skeletons,
especially those that relied on stable CO2 levels to produce them. These
organisms were susceptible to the effects of the ocean acidification that
resulted from increased atmospheric CO2. Organisms that relied on haemocyanin
or haemoglobin for transporting oxygen were more resistant to extinction than
those utilizing hemerythrin or oxygen diffusion. There is also evidence that
endemism was a strong risk factor influencing a taxon's likelihood of
extinction. Bivalve taxa that were endemic and localized to a specific region
were more likely to go extinct than cosmopolitan taxa. There was little
latitudinal difference in the survival rates of taxa. Organisms that inhabited
refugia less affected by global warming experienced lesser or delayed extinctions.[106]
Among
benthic organisms the extinction event multiplied background extinction rates,
and therefore caused maximum species loss to taxa that had a high background
extinction rate (by implication, taxa with a high turnover). The extinction
rate of marine organisms was catastrophic.Bioturbators were extremely severely
affected, as evidenced by the loss of the sedimentary mixed layer in many
marine facies during the end-Permian extinction.
Surviving
marine invertebrate groups included articulate brachiopods (those with a
hinge), which had undergone a slow decline in numbers since the P–Tr
extinction; the Ceratitida order of ammonites; and crinoids ("sea
lilies"), which very nearly became extinct but later became abundant and
diverse. The groups with the highest survival rates generally had active
control of circulation, elaborate gas exchange mechanisms, and light
calcification; more heavily calcified organisms with simpler breathing
apparatuses suffered the greatest loss of species diversity.In the case of the
brachiopods, at least, surviving taxa were generally small, rare members of a
formerly diverse community.
Conodonts
were severely affected in both taxonomic and morphological diversity, though
not as severely as during the Capitanian mass extinction.
| AMMONITES |
The
ammonoids, which had been in a long-term decline for the 30-million years since
the Roadian (middle Permian), suffered a selective extinction pulse 10-million
years before the main event, at the end of the Capitanian stage. In this
preliminary extinction, which greatly reduced disparity, or the range of
different ecological guilds, environmental factors were apparently responsible.
Diversity and disparity fell further until the P–Tr boundary; the extinction
here (P–Tr) was non-selective, consistent with a catastrophic initiator. During
the Triassic, diversity rose rapidly, but disparity remained low. The range of morphospace
occupied by the ammonoids, that is, their range of possible forms, shapes or
structures, became more restricted as the Permian progressed. A few million
years into the Triassic, the original range of ammonoid structures was once
again reoccupied, but the parameters were now shared differently among clades.
Ostracods
experienced prolonged diversity perturbations during the Changhsingian before
the PTME proper, when immense proportions of them abruptly vanished. At least
74% of ostracods died out during the PTME itself.
Bryozoans
had been on a long-term decline throughout the Late Permian epoch before they
suffered even more catastrophic losses during the PTME,being the most severely
affected clade among the lophophorates.
Deep-water
sponges experienced significant loss of diversity and a decrease in spicule
size over the course of the PTME. Shallow-water sponges were affected much less
strongly; they experienced an increase in spicule size and a much lower loss of
morphological diversity compared to their deep-water counterparts.
Foraminifera
experienced a severe diversity bottleneck. Evidence from South China indicates
the foraminiferal extinction had two pulses. Foraminiferal biodiversity
hotspots shifted into deeper waters during the PTME. Approximately 93% of
latest Permian foraminifera became extinct, with 50% of the clade Textulariina,
92% of Lagenida, 96% of Fusulinida, and 100% of Miliolida disappearing.
Foraminifera that were calcareous suffered an extinction rate of 91%. The
reasons why lagenides survived while fusulinoidean fusulinides went completely
extinct may have been the greater range of environmental tolerance and greater
geographic distribution of the former compared to the latter.
The buzzsaw shark (Helicoprion) AND MANY OTHER SPECIES DESTROYED DURING PERMIAN PERIOD
| The buzzsaw shark (Helicoprion) AND MANY OTHER SPECIES DESTROYED DURING PERMIAN PERIOD |
Cladodontomorph
sharks were able to survive (albeit barely) the PTME, with some ctenacanth
genera including Amelacanthus surviving the entirety of the event and into the
Early Triassic in refugia areas such as the waters of what is today Oman.
Multiple lineages of cladodontomorphs also survived the PTME as indicated by
additional post-PTME records of ctenacanths in Early Triassic deposits from the
Bear Lake Area of Idaho, U.S. alongside potentially from the Vega-Phroso
Siltstone Member of the Sulphur Mountains Formation of British Columbia,
Canada. The Cladodontomorphs were able to survive the PTME by likely utilizing
the deep oceans as specific zones of refugia, a hypothesis based on the
discovery of Early Cretaceous cladodontomorphs in deep, outer shelf
environments. Ichthyosaurs, which evolved immediately before the PTME, were
also PTME survivors.
The
Lilliput effect, the phenomenon of dwarfing of species during and immediately
following a mass extinction event, has been observed across the
Permian-Triassic boundary, notably occurring in foraminifera,
brachiopods,bivalves, and ostracods. Though gastropods that survived the
cataclysm were smaller in size than those that did not, it remains debated
whether the Lilliput effect truly took hold among gastropods. Some gastropod
taxa, termed "Gulliver gastropods", ballooned in size during and
immediately following the mass extinction, exemplifying the Lilliput effect's
opposite, which has been dubbed the Brobdingnag effect.
















Online Movies
No comments:
Post a Comment